WEBP Converter
Google's image format: about a third smaller than JPEG at the same quality, with transparency and animation built in.
35 tools
Convert to WEBP
Convert from WEBP
Other WEBP operations
What WEBP is for
WEBP was built to make web pages lighter, and it does the job: at a quality most people cannot tell from JPEG it comes out roughly 25 to 35 per cent smaller, and unlike JPEG it can carry transparency and short animations. That combination is why it replaced three formats at once on the web: JPEG for photographs, PNG for logos with transparent backgrounds, and GIF for small looping animations. If a picture is going on a website, WEBP is almost always the right answer in 2026; every browser still in use has supported it for years.
Where it still causes trouble
Outside the browser, WEBP support is patchy in exactly the places that matter to normal people: older photo printers, some picture frames, a few desktop editors, and the occasional web form that only accepts JPEG or PNG. That is the usual reason to convert away from it, and it is why the conversions in both directions live here side by side. WEBP also comes in two kinds, lossy like JPEG and lossless like PNG, and converting a lossless WEBP to JPEG throws away the quality it was keeping, so choose the target by what the picture is, not by habit.
Converting without losing anything twice
Every re-encode of a lossy image costs a little quality, and the loss accumulates: JPEG to WEBP to JPEG is worse than either step alone. The practical rule is to keep the original and convert from it each time, rather than converting a conversion. Where transparency is involved, remember that JPEG cannot store it at all. A transparent WEBP saved as JPEG comes back with a black or white background, which is why the tools here say so before you press the button rather than after.
Save a WEBP as JPG from a web page
Right-click an image on a modern site and the file that lands in Downloads is often a .webp, even when the page showed a photograph that started life as a JPEG, because the server converted it on the way out. That is fine for the browser and useless for the form, the print shop or the colleague who asked for a JPG. Drop the downloaded file into WebP to JPG, leave the quality at 90 or above, and you get an ordinary JPEG that looks the same on screen; up to a hundred files go through in one batch and come back as a ZIP. If the picture has a transparent background, WebP to PNG keeps it, where JPEG would fill it with white or the colour you choose.
Frequently asked questions
Is WEBP better than JPG?
For a web page, yes: the same picture is a quarter to a third smaller at the same quality, and WEBP can carry transparency. Outside the browser, JPG still wins on compatibility; printers, older editors and many upload forms do not read WEBP at all.
Why can't I open a WEBP file?
The program is older than the format. Every current browser opens WEBP, and so do Windows 11 Photos and recent macOS, but older photo viewers, many printers and some editors do not. Converting to JPG or PNG takes a few seconds and the picture looks identical.
Does converting WEBP to JPG lose quality?
A little, because JPEG re-encodes the pixels, but at quality 90 the difference is invisible. Lossless WEBP, the kind used for logos and screenshots, is better converted to PNG, which keeps every pixel exactly.